Intersectional Justice Exemptions in Our Movements

I would’ve retitled this exemptions of justice for those at the intersections. whose movement, slol

Al Ma'arrist

The Interspecies and Intersectional Justice conference would’ve been the 2nd best conference I’ve seen or heard, or at least complementary to The Vegan Praxis of Black Lives Matter. I’m still watching the IIJC, 1 vid per week-end.

[Some talks not to be missed: Dr. A. Breeze Harper’s, who mentioned and had organised The VPBLM, and among others I linked below (besides the problematic one), Aph Ko’s talk:]

BUT there is so much wrong with the presentation that followed Aph’s powerful talk!

Watching Zarna Joshi of Women of Color Speak Out and her erasure of indigenous cultures and her ally theatre, I’ve been on a rollercoaster of feeling nauseated, annoyed, disgusted, etc. In her introduction (at least she seemed honest therein, not counting crucial omissions such as she’s a Brahmin [the most caste-privileged]). One part of her talk is coming up in the 1st link that follows. 38m40s “Pythagoras theorem comes…

View original post 1,560 more words


While animals die of extreme cold elsewhere

CW: dead animals (murdered by water supply shortages and animal exploitation), anti-blackness.
It’s only mid summer here, the heat and humidity just kicked in. And here is what the media is doing or fueling besides the sad fact that these animals died and attention need to be brought to the lack of public services.

The animal exploiter seems Black, he does not have a water reservoir where he rears animals and water supply is being restricted, as yearly. Then trucks are supposed to bring water to those in need because no water is coming out of taps. They did not, he could not afford to bring the animals enough water from his home elsewhere. They died of thirst. Now commenters are sounding anti-Black singling out the responsibility of the exploiter. And this whole thing may fuel tacit or overt anti-Blackness.

The question, instead of being simplistic, is why the water was not delivered until after the death of the animals? If he gets compensated, is it a small price to pay to help fuel anti-Blackness in the country?

Animal exploitation (though this is a low-risk industry by design with all the subsidies) thus fuels anti-blackness, with the help of the media.

And I will add, for the sake of simplistic thinkers who may pin this on politics, a long overdue critique of PMSD leader X. L. Duval. XLD has been criticised on some obvious PMSD nepotism for the Festival International Kreol.

But here is what no one dared say, to my knowledge: He went on a ramble about having read a book on a French slaveholder we all know (that he and others respect), he mentioned it to 1. bring up that a slave’s name was Duval and claim Black ancestry through that odd ‘find’ and 2. to emphasize good treatment of the slave by the slaveowner when the former was injured. He pointed out something along the lines of, don’t be surprised and in Africa it was often Black Africans who sold others as slaves. This was all a big part of his opening speech of a Black Islander Festival. And it’s all good because anti-Blackness is all fine and dandy here.

The frustration of reading white pseudo-philosophers

EDIT: I did not hear of the news about the death of the 13-year-old Jain girl when I wrote this. I was on social media tolerating white supremacy and came across the below-mentioned vegan blog.

Sometimes I’m convinced that white vegans (not regular readers I follow too but those who reinforce white supremacy, like in Southern Africa, parts of which are my countries; those who would be in comments draining me further [they already do] if I shared my blog) just throw up anything they rote-learn or once-heard from intersectional vegans to appear pro-intersectional themselves (and other vegans lap it up).

Red flags can range from the word ‘intersectionalism’, to anything really. Take as an example, there are dualities everywhere culturally, and morality is often a reflex not a thought-out argument. Most people don’t even have cars or drive trains but yes most people don’t help animals in need or choose not to eat them, or even if they do, they don’t care if a litter [what’s the word for a pack of kittens again?] live or die. It is also true that many humans treat other animals less worse than they treat disabled humans. Simply, it seems easier to walk a dog or feed a cat, or to not eat animals or their food/ovulatings, than create access. I understand Black disabled friends’ anger over this, I do not have anger but

I do find it crap to have white vegans contrast disabled people to non-human animals, although ways in which we are disabled are as varied as there are species.

Critisizing Glover is not an endorsement of Metz’s argument here.

1. White vegans [or insert non-disabled group] would use a disabled concept, transfer it to any situation just coz. When the context they use it in has underlying disability justice issues, they cannot even imagine it does.

2. White vegans like to speak of Jains like they’re experts in Jainism or Jain themselves. There is a prohibition against disabled Jains from becoming monks [monks are allowed to live from charity, I’m not sure if the 2 are related] though a Digambara monk can wear glasses (you wouldn’t know what I’m talking about, a monk was speaking at congress naked [they’re not allowed clothes in that branch], but wearing glasses of course).

I’m not Jain but I’m myopic, so it’s chilled. And in case you don’t know, Jains have nonetheless been part of my culture for 1000s of years, and wrote my epics.

Either way, this illustrates what happens when one treats intersectionality like Kleenex. No reference here to what Kimberley Crenshaw said about intersectionality and kleenex though tbh white vegans may have misunderstood her, if they even know she spoke of that.

the above-mentioned Digambara monk

World Farm Animals Day Must Fall

A late post after the event.

“The Ghanaian protesters against Gandhi understand this at some fundamental level. Indeed the equation of Gandhi with power is the subtext of their protest: the petition calling for the removal of the statue insists that it is ‘better to stand up for our dignity than to kowtow to the wishes of a burgeoning Eurasian superpower’. Whatever India once meant as a leading postcolonial state speaking truth to geopolitical power, it weighs increasingly heavily on the African continent through its investment, infrastructure-building and hunger for resources, notably land. And in a striking parallel with the grouse against Gandhi, India increasingly features in African public consciousness via alarmingly frequent reports of racist hate crimes against Africans, especially students, in India. Prompted by the murder of a Congolese man in New Delhi, African Heads of Mission threatened to boycott the Africa Day celebrations organised by the Indian Council for Cultural Relations in June 2016, the very month in which the Indian President unveiled the Gandhi statue in Accra. At least one of the Ghanaian protesters has noted that the best way to deepen relations between Africa and India might be to protect African students who are repeatedly under attack in India.”

A Gandhi statue ruining what would be a beautiful built landscape in Ghana. A pied crow flies by under a cloudy sky judging those who placed it there. Photo and quotes from
A Gandhi statue ruining what would be a beautiful built landscape in Ghana. A pied crow flies by under a cloudy sky judging those who placed it there. Photo and quotes from


The misconception that satyagraha is Gandhian when it is, in fact, Buddhist and Ambedkar held a Mahad satyagraha 3 years before Gandhi did. Both sources I linked are problematic and misinformed, in ways but very valuable.

Statute books describe the Indians as belonging to the “aboriginal or semi-barbarous race of Asia” while as a matter of fact there is hardly one Indian in South Africa belonging to the aboriginal stock. Santhals of Assam will be as useless in South Africa as the natives of that country…” Racist and Anti-Adivasi Statements by Gandhi. Mumbai Sept 26, 1896.

World Farm Animals Day is a Gandhi memorial, it needs to be abolished (as do animal exploitation farms). Why, white people, why are there so many more things to abolish in the world, only thanks to you? Why are you hating on human animals and worshipping a dead immoral guy, just to hide the fact that you hate oppressed Indians, Indigenous and Black folks (sexually assaulted or exploited survivors and women)? It’s not fine just because other Gandhians hate them too, along with some known leaders. In this day and age, there is no misconception possible, like there was before, at least for some deceased movement leaders outside India. Dumping Gandhi does not mean appreciating Godse. White vegans probably don’t even know who Godse is.

Readers, if you’ve seen it yesterday or elsewhere, you may have already signed this petition. Otherwise, please consider signing and sharing!

Footnotes if you don’t want to click certain links:

The facebook photo linked has the text and context in comment, it is as follows: 

I believe that caste has saved Hinduism from disintegration. But
like every other institution it has suffered from excrescences. I consider
the four divisions alone to be fundamental, natural and essential.
The innumerable subcastesare sometimes a convenience, often a
hindrance. The sooner there is fusion, the better….

One of my correspondents suggests that we should
abolish the caste [system] but adopt the class system of Europe –
meaning thereby, I suppose, that the idea of heredity in caste
should be rejected. I am inclined to think that the law of heredity
is an eternal law and any attempt to alter that law must lead us, as
it has before led [others], to utter confusion….

If Hindus believe, as they must believe, in reincarnation [and]
transmigration, they must know that Nature will, without any
possibility of mistake, adjust the balance by degrading a Brahmin, if
he misbehaves himself, by reincarnating him in a lower division,and
translating one who lives the life of a Brahmin in his present incarnation
to Brahminhood in his next.

-Young India, Vol. III, by M. K. Gandhi

Another quote h/t Thenmozhi Soundararajan

“The ideal bhangi of my conception would be a Brahmin par-excellence, possibly even excel him. It is possible to envisage-the existence of a bhangi without a
Brahmin. But without the former the latter could not be, It is the bhangi who enables society to live. A bhangi does for society what a mother does for her baby. A mother washes her baby of the dirt and insures his health. Even so the bhangi protects and safeguards the health of that entire community by maintaining sanitation for it. The Brahmin’s duty is to look after the sanitation of the soul, the bhangi’s that of the body of society. But there is a difference in practice ; the Brahmin generally does not live up to his duty, the bhangi does willy-nilly no doubt.

But that is not all. My ideal bhangi would know the quality of night-soil and urine. He would keep a close watch on these and give a timely warning to the individual concerned. Thus, he will give a timely notice of the results of his examination of the excreta. That presuppposes a
scientific knowledge of the requirements of his profession. He would likewise be an authority on the subject of disposal of night-soil in small villages as well as big cities and his advice and guidance in the matter would be sought for and freely given to society. It goes without saying that he would have the usual learning necessary for reaching the
standard here laid down for his profession. Such an ideal bhangi while deriving his livelihood from his occupation, would approach it only as a sacred duty. In other words he would not dream of amassing wealth out of it. He would consider himself responsible for the proper removal and
disposal of all the dirt and night-soil within the area which he serves and regard the maintenance of healthy and sanitary condition within the same as the summum bonum of his existence.”
Harijan : Nov. 28, 1936.

On the celibate sexual predator and other misogyny, excluding the fat-shaming of his wife (no sources at hand):

“During his years in South Africa, he once responded to a young man’s sexual harassment of two of Gandhi’s female followers by forcibly cutting the girls’ hair short to make sure they didn’t invite any sexual attention. He operated under the assumption that men couldn’t control their basic predatory impulses while simultaneously asserting that women were responsible for—and completely at the mercy of—these impulses. His views on female sexuality were similarly deplorable; according to Rita Banerji, writing in Sex and Power, Gandhi viewed menstruation as the “manifestation of the distortion of a woman’s soul by her sexuality.” He also believed the use of contraceptives was the sign of whoredom.

He confronted this inability to control male libido head-on when he vowed celibacy (without discussing it with his wife) back in India, and using women—including some underage girls, like his grand-niece—to test his sexual patience. He’d sleep naked next to them [naked] in bed without touching them, making sure he didn’t get aroused; these women were props to coax him into celibacy.”

Intersectional Justice Exemptions in Our Movements

The Interspecies and Intersectional Justice conference could’ve been the 2nd best conference I’ve seen or heard on the topic, at least complementary to The Vegan Praxis of Black Lives Matter.

[Some talks not to be missed: Dr. A. Breeze Harper’s, who mentioned and had organised The VPBLM, and among others I linked below (besides the problematic one), Aph Ko’s talk:]

BUT there is so much wrong with the presentation that followed Aph’s powerful talk!

Watching Zarna Joshi of Women of Color Speak Out and her erasure of indigenous cultures and her ally theatre, I’ve been on a rollercoaster of feeling nauseated, annoyed, disgusted, etc. In her introduction (at least she seemed honest therein, not counting crucial omissions such as she’s a Brahmin [the most caste-privileged]). One part of her talk is coming up in the 1st link that follows. 38m40s “Pythagoras theorem comes from ancient indigenous wisdom of India, it is in the Hindu scriptures and was there for a lot longer than Europeans had ever heard of mathematics…”

Not only is Hinduism not indigenous, but it  has been destroying indigenous cultures and languages, and continues to do so. Shakahara (is a Sanskrit term for vegetarianism, it stands for plant-eaters*) was also co-option.

Co-option of indigenous beliefs and her tone and lack of humility when corrected by a Xicano/Latino/Aztec at the end. Joshi had been, in her talk, speaking of Native people of respective land masses as one entity. She implies Hinduism, the world’s 3rd largest religion and a feudal system that excludes indigenous (and Dalit), is indigenous when it’s an estate and part of at least two others in India.

She doesn’t, and in any case is the worst possible person to, speak about land grabs and absurd violence against Adivasis and Dalits [Content warning for link: brutal rape and violence I could not even read through].

Did Joshi learn the name of any of the indigenous peoples of the lands she has been talking about, like the Niger Delta or Congo? Or does she know there are over 3000 ethnic groups with distinct cultures in Africa. Joshi merely says when corrected in Q&A, that there are many languages, and customs in different parts, and that Africa is not a country, as if we don’t know. She lives on Turtle island.

This is like Arundhati Roy calling herself black in ELLE magazine, except for the latter, black folks could tell it’s BS. Brahmins and Banias act like they have no lanes when it’s convenient to them, as do other savarnas. Some have been calling Roy a Brahmin (she doesn’t need to be from a Hindu family to be one, she is in any case Savarna).

Brahmins and forward castes (savarna) are to India what white people are to South Africa (the minority that controls institutions, are visible in the media etc.), the “divinely-appointed”, the holders of knowledge (they co-opted from Dalits and indigenous peoples – whose land they also stole and keep stealing); they experience some racism in the Global North/West, but surely like the Japanese woman who asked a question, regardless of skin colour (there is admiration or objectification of their respective cultures). Joshi keeps her patronising Brahminical tone and detracts from the latter question, explains her coined term “colonial hangover”. Assuming that it was metaphorically from the spiking of drinks or drinking water of the colonised people, this is NOT a hangover unless you grew up a rather privileged British Brahmin whose experience is in no way comparable to even a British person of a lower caste or a desi of another religion. I think her following suggestion of “colonial education among your communities” is a subconscious slip of her tongue. Then, never did she ask the woman if she had answered her question. We know more about Japanese exploitation of South Korean women, than we know about ongoing rapes of Adivasi and Dalit-Bahujan women by Brahminical men, or threats (CW for link: writer meena kandasamy getting a threat wishing for her gang rape pornography, because she tweeted about attending a beef-eating festival), and apathy by Savarna women who practice something akin to white feminism – Braminist feminism.

This depicts Krishna (whom Joshi prayed to, softly-but-in-the-mic, at the start of her talk) suckling a cow, pushing away the calf, while a woman reprimands him. More about Krishna.

Browsing 3 short un-numbered pages of Joshi’s male guru, Swami Mukundananda’s Spiritual Dialectics:

1. I came across casteist spin that help young and naive(?) Hindus think there is no casteism, in other words, the Indian version of “I don’t see race”. However, she is someone navigating the world as Zarna [Brahmin name].

But of course one outgrows this naivety, even in a diaspora where Hindu traditions remain very 1752. Anyone in social justice is likely to have realised the oppressiveness, on Turtle Island e.g., one would realise most organisers are upper caste whether or not one reads BGD (see Gee’s statement in interview linked); and if one is oppressed, one is probably more aware from early on. Cf white kids and black kids but in casteism, there is no parallel with colourism necessarily, although there is also colourism towards girls/women.

Zarna and I are the same age (idk her but she likes to talk about her past activism, and mentions her age then) and from diasporas, she, from the 1st world and I from the developing. I don’t know any anti-casteist movement in Southern Africa, but I know some UK and USian groups. For someone who boasts about her excellent British education to have researched Adivasis to erase them [to the point of not using the word ‘Adivasi’ at all (lest someone looks it up and figures her out?), to call Hindus indigenous] then claim a right to talk about African indigenous peoples and First Nations, like Zarna did, is absurd.

2. He claims that Buddhism came after the Vedas. This is more erasure.

3. He uses ableist discourse that uses disabled people to make a point.

That account he gives of 3 Blind men each touching different parts of an elephant’s body once and arguing over their conclusions, is not how Blind people operate, unless this was a game being played by a sighted person where Blind folks were used as animals would be, and they are only allowed to touch one part for a second and guess. They wouldn’t draw a conclusion based on that. The elephant of course stands there like a non-interactive object, neither warm nor breathing. The animals in the reader’s imagination are the Blind, it could’ve been a story that uses 3 monkeys to make the same point.

But let’s not dis her Guru, whom she only praised in that presentation (and whom she also writes books for). Also note that the term ‘shakahari’ (she firmly says to the audience “you’re not a vegan, you’re a shakahari (plant-eater)”) is considered outdated by someone in Bangalore, who had not heard it since high school, or it is simply not used outside of Hindu religious discourse.

Krishna’s sexual harassment is not only ok but revered up to this day, worldwide (in a framework that says women can’t climb trees in this case?).

Joshi’s talk with Q&A was 3 and 4 times longer than lauren Ornelas or Brenda Sanders respectively. As if we needed over an hour of erasing indigenous peoples with a patronising tone and spreading misconceptions along with information that is also important but not her own research. Her 1st world Brahminical discourse is not the only one, she erased indenture and erased complexities such as French colonies forcing Indians after indenture, to register babies with Christian first names. Only one’s middle name could be Indian until they changed the legislation in Reunion island.

This is a Brahmin woman spreading misinformation to an audience who is already misinformed, about India – a country where the Dadri lynching was perpetrated by upper castes and where tribal people in Jharkhand’s Latehar live in fear and are more severely affected by drought, after the lynching of 2 young boys. Nowhere did she mention the lynchings, this is about the shakaharis she is so proud of!

Here is Joshi, claiming to be ‘intersectional’, pretending she and other Hindus are indigenous which is as if Zionists were to claim they are Mizrahim**, Palestinian or both. How could that amazing conference end on the such a low note, and of all the moving and well-researched and well-thought-out talks there were, hers is the only one scheduled to go live? Joshi was presumably never asked in a public way to not co-opt (assuming I could give permission to share this [nope, do not share with whites and Brahminists], it puts me at risk but I’ll share this with a few organisers), and her talk was dispersing of misinformation, which has been viewed live and later by many hundreds.

If anyone reading this knows Adivasis or Dalits who want to write about this, they may by all means use this, without crediting me.
PS. It’s taking me a while to get the timestamps because Joshi’s Braminical tone is frankly triggering, more timestamps coming up in comments below.


Adivasi and Dalit activists doing tireless advocacy or awareness work in India and diasporas. My focus is toward South India, as are my examples, being Dravidian myself. Every womanist, feminist or social justice activist, among Indians or diasporics I know, knows how damaging casteism is. But more know they’ll get away with it. Here is an Indian journalist thinking she’ll get away with being anti-indigenous Soni Sori, pictured, was attacked with a corrosive substance and she was fighting for her life at the time. Rupa was dragged on social media by Dalit activists but otherwise, she can get away with it – Rupa still seems to be a journalist, thus caste privilege works like white privilege.

. Gee Semmalar for telling me Joshi is a Brahmin name, and for clarifying that Brahminism/Vedic religion unlike Aryan religion came after Buddhism.

*Jayaprakash Satyamurthy for the link and for telling me more about ‘shakahari’.

**My Mizrahi friend, billie rain.

Naartjies and oranges

I wrote this 2 months ago and did not publish it, for some reason. It’s possible that a friend was here on holiday and we had a similar discussion which got really intense and while I should worry about the guilting and shaming of me, I worried about whether she’s depressed (and would be more depressed reading this) after I offered perspective on her own practices that deviated from the mythical purity of veganism. White veganism makes one hold or have shame and guilt around certain needs while consuming and taking food pics to contradict that shame and guilt.

I realised a bit more what POS people are with this social media citrus uproar (as Lawrence Carter-Long put it), people are still being ableist about this 2 months on.

I already consume little (within a much more limited range than vegans) but I was shamed by former friends who, I then argued, consume more, smoke etc. I’ve struggled a lot with self-esteem, then vegan self-esteem (guilt of not doing enough, I just made the word up) that I wouldn’t have it. These two white vegans shamed me for menstruating “unsutainably” while one of them had a sewing machine and could actually do something (which they’d do as work) instead (for which I offered to pay her), but shaming was easier. I must add: not everyone can use menstrual cups. Bodies don’t work the one and only trve way you learned in biology (or even medicine, the students I knew have been as ignorant as some doctors).

When disabled folks say eradicating something is not possible bc [insert needs], people would shame them, while being the ones who are consumerist with their wants: using loads of coconut water from Thailand for competitive athletic performance not health, it’s got a label and aluminium. Or them using all sorts of coconut things in a land of no coconuts. Or using processed moringa package wrapped bc it’s the latest superfood trend (which exploits labour and encourages monoculture in my country too, ok? As in it’s local to me, the state is white supremacist af & at the every least, if you had needed to remove those tinytiny twigs from the leaves yourselves, you’d never consume it). Or all the superfoods (probably unnecessary in their diets) and all the packaged meals they buy, serve or offer.

[An old local séga about moringa, and its dishes by working-class/ economically oppressed people, the dishes Marclaine sang about are vegan btw]

Wholefoods is probably targetting a class and race but other stores, if they did this, could cater to a need. Whereas the trend of white people making raw things with coconut oil or paleo things with packaged and imported coconut flour is a trend. When we use coconuts (not harvested by monkeys here, and in 2016 there has been 1 human death in the harvesting, reportedly an accident with the ladder and a rare occurence) the only waste is the natural husk but things get made by people: mulch, and since forever, coconut brooms with which in Mauritius, we all clean our yards. Bottled coconut water is a new thing here but no label, recyclable and lightweight. Contrast with glass bottles and the weight that gets shipped from Thailand to Capetown probably by air bc though it’s not refrigerated it’s shelf life wouldn’t permit several months shipping surely. Or worse, there is cling-wrapped half-husked green coconuts at PicknPay and Wellness Warehouse. Please let’s have a 2nd social media uproar on this bc this is actually bad and cling-wrapped (several layers) is not recyclable (unlike the Wholefoods plastic tub?).

The problem is often the branding, that label may not be recyclable but hey, like your stickers on your fruits from the market! I used to collect a lot more of display plastic from fruits as a kid! An uncle sells fruits and kept them for us kids. This reminds that maybe you don’t see all the waste your food produces and you don’t care. In contrast, it’s easy to target vulnerable people who are visible, or outspoken about a need or struggle.

         An illustration of how much invisible waste is produced by an ‘Apollo dan Bol’

The outrage was about naartjie or ‘mandarine’ (tangerine), it doesn’t seem hard to peel, to me who occasionally have dexterity injuries but I never tried then (intolerant to citrus), and it wouldn’t make a difference if I had – if it is hard for others that is what is relevant.

Someone also tweeted that they have citrus peel allergy. What would be preferable, gloves (if even a solution, non recyclable afaik) or biodegradable recyclable containers? It’s not up to you but to the person.


Endorsement by Coldplay and Bey

If Coldplay’s Hymn for a Weekend were about cultures from East Africa to Assam, would it have been different? Probably not – they appropriated and mislabelled Asian cultures before. The video features religion prominently, it is set in Mumbai and then covers only 2 other Indian states. Coldplay uses Holi and Sadhus but also Kathakali and Bharatnatyam dancers, as if this is an advert for the tourism office of India. Then Beyoncé’s jewellery seems inspired from Ivorian Coast bridal face veils (c/f Chad), the rest of that African attire is similar to North Indian bridal wear.

The timing of the release is inconsiderate and illustrates the disconnect Coldplay (and Bey) have with Indian cultures. In the aftermath of the suicide of Rohith Vemula, we can only expect to hear from certain people on this now, and not others – the most oppressed, whose views would be more important. I had heard of Coldplay and Yoncé and have equal unfamiliarity with their songs; I had never heard of Sonam Kapoor who, after googling, looks familiar. Bollywood* is not my culture but it’s almost all there is on TV that is non-white and subtitled. I watched 1.5 Chinese serials living in Mauritius, and I do catch Bolly movies (not in entirety) on TV and I don’t bother to know actors’ names or the film title. They’re always terrible, and I wasn’t even aware of the anti-blackness. Then it’s always some Kapoor or other; another Kapoor, Ekta, has been writing for TV since she’s 17 to make her own money and have a more luxurious life (kinda like Rihanna except EK has no talent so to speak**).


Now I know Sonam’s the highest paid Bollywood actress, so Coldplay, how much did you pay the poor children you featured? It seems all over Desi media that Sonam is the mystical muse, what then is Beyoncé? Was Bey alone not enough? Her voice is also central to this obviously. An Indian filmmaker shot this. Some complained about the name Rani but Bey was the protagonist in a film called Rani according to the script. The biggest problem is not Yoncé’s dress or mehndi-ed hands, the biggest issue is Coldplay using poverty and religion. The issue is the endorsement, of Coldplay BS by Yoncé and of the religion by Coldplay who has tons of white privilege and could have used it to critique what it is using as aesthetics but instead, it’s using poverty as additional aesthetics with the video not being a commentary on the link between this oppression and religion.

On many levels, from incense (there was incense, right? or it’s implied in the background) in the video being made by child labour in India. If they were fishermen’s children maybe they have to work too. Maybe Holi is the only day some of those children get to play but they got enslaved by Coldplay on that day I presume. Rih too, was guilty of appropriating while collaborating with Coldplay. I didn’t know that song or collab even existed. I don’t follow Beyoncé for wanting to encourage plant-based lifestyles or anything. I keep up to date via friends who are fans. There would be music videos at a gym I pretended to work at (as a desi in the Cape Colony, one can pretend to work (or gets mistaken for an employee in) many places, apparently we all look alike) or if I caught Bey on TV between other programming, I’d watch. I didn’t know what Coldplay looked like to be honest, their music never seemed good enough to bother. Coldplay’s trend of using Asian cultures and asking influential black women to join them is more problematic than any appropriation there, but there’s the endorsement of the Hindutva by everyone involved this time. Beyoncé knew she was helping Orientalism though she might be unaware of the rest. Coldplay otoh went to India and Chris Martin even worked with Oxfam India!

For Harriet has a piece. [Along the lines of what I’d been tweeting yesterday] A reply to it:

Jason Jeremias*** said “Operating under the umbrella of Western culture through the orientalist gaze erasing the diverse plurality of Indian culture and celebrating the Hindutva culture that is murdering Dalits, tribal peoples, and Muslims, you do. It’s a wavering on imperial imposition for the benefit of the so-called artist. The vast community may not benefit, but Beyonce does, and thus is appropriating.”

In a nutshell, except there is much unnecessary backlash on Bey. One may wonder if there is one good thing that can possibly come out of this video which is the potential of Yoncé to counter Bollywood’s colourism but they may have ruined it by featuring Sonam, and some are wondering what Yoncé is wearing on her face. Some are suggesting a Bollywood actress should’ve been featured instead of Yoncé, uhm, there was one already so do they mean another one lipsyncing to Mangeshkar’s voice? Wait, do they mean to Yoncé’s voice? That’s offensive. The aesthetics of voice is relevant. Bey’s cleavage is also being used to sell and/or enforce something and in the context of Hindutva’s war on Dalit women’s bodies (from popular culture to rape and murder) since this is a different setting, whoever made the decisions, she’s now partaking in this violence from the position of the Hindutva by uncritically featuring in this Coldplay song, not as herself. Hindutva maintains a caste system where white people are welcome to join the priestly caste and class, regardless of social class. It feeds off white supremacy.

Regardless of what you think of the video or my words, you want to read the context (hyperlinks): what Holi is actually celebrating (wherever) or whose India we are talking about. And some of the issues I have with Coldplay now, I also have them with MIA jsyk

singers in yellowface/ brownface including Beyonce.
Mainstream singers fetishizing Asia

*Once a friend asked for film recommendations, I’d watched 2 ok ones over 3 years – none were Bollywood (there is other Indian cinema, ideologically but also regionally) One was Dor, which is a 2006 remake of a 2004 Malayali film. Couldn’t they just dub it and add their songs? This kind of normalised thing ties in with colourism of that industry (and culture).

** I’ve watched a few of her soapies. I heard the highlight of her work was Tulsi’s portrayed realism, I had a glimpse during my vacation but Tulsi was still played by a young [who passes as old bc of sizeism] light-skinned, straight-haired and physically attractive person. Generally a curly-haired actress would be the villain, often Bengali women; and same trope for less-light skin in men (sometimes in women).

***Quoting white-passing men bc brown women I see are like (innacurary and misplaced anger perhaps) “I said this once @Kat Blaque and I’ll say it again:

So who’s profiting off this shit? The white british guy (really??) prancing around my people or the poor underprivileged kids they used to yet again portray India like some poor, third world country?

And Beyoncé is getting her Madonna on I see.
Not knowing what the fuck she’s doing with her hands, but “it looks sooo prettyy”!

End of the day, no matter how many natives they included in the video, those people won’t be seeing SHIT of that money.

Sonam Kapoor was seen for like 3 seconds in the video and she was all excited and shit like memsaahib threw her a cookie? My people need to get off white people’s d*cks. Especially the white American d*cks.

So when it comes to our clothes, mehndi, use of bright colors and all those pretty looking cultural aspects, people look and care? But they look the other way as soon as our social issues are being discussed? Fuck the fuck off.

Also, did anyone notice the misuse and mixing of cultural and religious customs? No? THEY DIDN’T EITHER BECAUSE THEY DON’T CARE. It just all looks soooo pretty!

Whenever we ourselves dress or practice our religion in western countries, it’s frowned upon or met with racist allegations. But when rich popstars do it, “it’s soooo edgyyy” and “OMG Yoncé looks sooo prettyyy”? F*ckouttahere.

I’m just gonna leave this here” — Aashna Devi to Love Life of an Asian Guy (where I also found the Yoncé mosaic). She posted the screegrab below and I did learn thanks to her that Coldplay is USian. So in this, I guess I knew Bey the most.